Comments on: Canonical URLs and duplicate content

By: Getting more links from high ranking pages – James Morell’s SEO Work

Getting more links from high ranking pages – James Morell’s SEO Work — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:39:47 +0000

[...] rel=canonical tag, many webmasters rejoiced – in fact I was rather excited and posted about duplicate content and rel=canonical here. At the same time I was looking at some of the anchor text used in the internal links off a [...]

By: Justin March

Justin March — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:03:59 +0000

Good question Cole the best explanation that I have seen of this can be found here: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/canonical-url-tag-the-most-important-advancement-in-seo-practices-since-sitemaps#jtc78473

By: Cole

Cole — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:27:48 +0000

great summary James, thats pretty much the silver bullet for unavoidable dupe content. How similar to the ‘wrong’ URL does the rel have to be i wonder? Bet it won’t work for a certain type of nav we all know and love ;o)